Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SLCVX
RMEBX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.36
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$29.20
Change+$0.26 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.69M
RMEBX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SLCVX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SLCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. SLCVX (17.7M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMEBX (1.05) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.39 vs. SLCVX (-6.50). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.90 vs. SLCVX (28.01).
| RMEBX | SLCVX | RMEBX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.88 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.88 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.463 | 12.351 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 17.7M | 627,119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.39 | -6.50 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.85 | 19.82 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.90 | 28.01 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.01 | 40.01 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement