Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SFLNX
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$29.86
Change+$0.09 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.04B
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SFLNX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SFLNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. SFLNX (10B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SFLNX (1.70) vs RMEBX (1.12). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SFLNX (18 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: SFLNX (0) vs RMEBX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. RMEBX (11.26). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 95.32 vs. RMEBX (59.35).
| RMEBX | SFLNX | RMEBX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.25 | 428% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.25 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.253 | 7.179 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 10B | 1,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.70 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.26 | 13.09 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.31 | 49.38 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.35 | 95.32 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.17 | 113.96 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers