Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SFLNX
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$31.76
Change-$0.35 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.68B
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SFLNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SFLNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. SFLNX (10.7B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SFLNX (1.57) vs RMEBX (1.05). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SFLNX (19 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: SFLNX (0) vs RMEBX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. RMEBX (6.55). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 86.15 vs. RMEBX (53.80).
| RMEBX | SFLNX | RMEBX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.25 | 428% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.25 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.940 | 15.255 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 10.7B | 1,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.57 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | 11.26 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.03 | 51.30 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.80 | 86.15 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.20 | 138.06 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers