Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SFLNX
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$29.72
Change+$0.17 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.01B
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SFLNX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SFLNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SFLNX (10B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SFLNX (1.70) vs RMEBX (1.12). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SFLNX (18 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: SFLNX (0) vs RMEBX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.70 vs. RMEBX (11.31). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 100.88 vs. RMEBX (60.65).
| RMEBX | SFLNX | RMEBX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.25 | 428% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.25 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.495 | 6.676 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 10B | 1,090% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.70 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.31 | 13.70 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.70 | 51.39 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.65 | 100.88 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.57 | 112.68 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement