Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMDCX vs TRQZX
RMDCX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts RMDCX vs TRQZX
Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth C
Price$2.41
Change-$1.11 (-31.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets435.82M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$98.26
Change-$6.13 (-5.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
RMDCX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMDCX vs. TRQZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMDCX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. RMDCX (436M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than RMDCX: TRQZX (0.74) vs RMDCX (0.00). RMDCX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: RMDCX (24 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). RMDCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). RMDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMDCX: TRQZX (0) vs RMDCX (2500). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.09 vs. RMDCX (-22.01). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.86 vs. RMDCX (-43.56).
| RMDCX | TRQZX | RMDCX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.61 | 292% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -0.061 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 436M | 25.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.01 | -5.09 | 433% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.09 | 2.38 | 509% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.56 | -13.86 | 314% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement