RMCO
Price
$3.10
Change
+$0.15 (+5.07%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
45.72M
SAMG
Price
$14.34
Change
+$0.12 (+0.84%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
121.04M
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMCO vs SAMG

Header iconRMCO vs SAMG Comparison
Open Charts RMCO vs SAMGBanner chart's image
Royalty Management Holding
Price$3.10
Change+$0.15 (+5.07%)
Volume$35.49K
Capitalization45.72M
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
Price$14.34
Change+$0.12 (+0.84%)
Volume$26.09K
Capitalization121.04M
RMCO vs SAMG Comparison Chart in %
RMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMCO vs. SAMG commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMCO is a Hold and SAMG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (RMCO: $3.11 vs. SAMG: $14.34)
Brand notoriety: RMCO and SAMG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMCO: 39% vs. SAMG: 104%
Market capitalization -- RMCO: $45.72M vs. SAMG: $121.04M
RMCO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $45.72M. SAMG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $121.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $180.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAMG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RMCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMCO is a better buy in the long-term than SAMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMCO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAMG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMCO is a better buy in the short-term than SAMG.

Price Growth

RMCO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while SAMG (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.22% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAMG($121M) has a higher market cap than RMCO($45.7M). RMCO YTD gains are higher at: 218.489 vs. SAMG (-18.983). SAMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.1M vs. RMCO (-130.17K). SAMG has more cash in the bank: 26.1M vs. RMCO (147K). RMCO has less debt than SAMG: RMCO (613K) vs SAMG (21.3M). SAMG has higher revenues than RMCO: SAMG (124M) vs RMCO (2.64M).
RMCOSAMGRMCO / SAMG
Capitalization45.7M121M38%
EBITDA-130.17K22.1M-1%
Gain YTD218.489-18.983-1,151%
P/E RatioN/A16.48-
Revenue2.64M124M2%
Total Cash147K26.1M1%
Total Debt613K21.3M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAMG: Fundamental Ratings
SAMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52
SMR RATING
1..100
68
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMCOSAMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DCTIF0.02N/A
N/A
REGENERA INSIGHTS INC.
ESHDF0.32N/A
N/A
Esprit Holdings Ltd.
WEICF1.85N/A
N/A
Weichai Power Company Ltd.
SREMF3.53-0.11
-3.03%
Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd.
FPAFF0.82-0.03
-3.66%
First Pacific Company Ltd.

RMCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCO and WT have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCO and WT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMCO
1D Price
Change %
RMCO100%
+4.90%
WT - RMCO
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCM - RMCO
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
SAMG - RMCO
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
SAR - RMCO
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
GBDC - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
More

SAMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMG has been loosely correlated with CNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAMG jumps, then CNS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAMG
1D Price
Change %
SAMG100%
+0.84%
CNS - SAMG
45%
Loosely correlated
+5.81%
VRTS - SAMG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
APAM - SAMG
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
STT - SAMG
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
DHIL - SAMG
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
More