RMCF
Price
$1.53
Change
-$0.01 (-0.65%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12M
TR
Price
$41.20
Change
+$0.38 (+0.93%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.97B
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMCF vs TR

Header iconRMCF vs TR Comparison
Open Charts RMCF vs TRBanner chart's image
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
Price$1.53
Change-$0.01 (-0.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization12M
Tootsie Roll Industries
Price$41.20
Change+$0.38 (+0.93%)
Volume$1.19K
Capitalization2.97B
RMCF vs TR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMCF vs. TR commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMCF is a Hold and TR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (RMCF: $1.54 vs. TR: $40.82)
Brand notoriety: RMCF and TR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMCF: 16% vs. TR: 85%
Market capitalization -- RMCF: $12M vs. TR: $2.97B
RMCF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $12M. TR’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $79.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $15.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TR is a better buy in the long-term than RMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TR is a better buy in the short-term than RMCF.

Price Growth

RMCF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +6.21% price change this week, while TR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

TR is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.41% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TR($2.98B) has a higher market cap than RMCF($12M). TR YTD gains are higher at: 30.775 vs. RMCF (-36.626). TR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 154M vs. RMCF (-3.12M). TR has more cash in the bank: 171M vs. RMCF (893K). RMCF has less debt than TR: RMCF (7.1M) vs TR (14.4M). TR has higher revenues than RMCF: TR (723M) vs RMCF (29.5M).
RMCFTRRMCF / TR
Capitalization12M2.98B0%
EBITDA-3.12M154M-2%
Gain YTD-36.62630.775-119%
P/E RatioN/A32.80-
Revenue29.5M723M4%
Total Cash893K171M1%
Total Debt7.1M14.4M49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMCF vs TR: Fundamental Ratings
RMCF
TR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10044
SMR RATING
1..100
9869
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1219
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TR's Valuation (59) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (78). This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.

TR's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMCF (100). This means that TR’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMCF’s over the last 12 months.

TR's SMR Rating (69) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (98). This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.

TR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (50). This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.

RMCF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as TR (19). This means that RMCF’s stock grew similarly to TR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMCFTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRDO140.826.82
+5.09%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
DSS1.250.04
+3.31%
DSS
WNS75.40N/A
N/A
WNS (Holdings) Limited
LAKE14.98-0.02
-0.13%
Lakeland Industries
EXOD24.03-0.28
-1.15%
Exodus Movement Inc

RMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCF and HLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCF and HLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMCF
1D Price
Change %
RMCF100%
+1.99%
HLF - RMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
DAR - RMCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
FARM - RMCF
10%
Poorly correlated
+5.76%
TR - RMCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
MZTI - RMCF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
More

TR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TR has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TR jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TR
1D Price
Change %
TR100%
+0.99%
KHC - TR
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
HSY - TR
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
CPB - TR
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.19%
MDLZ - TR
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
GIS - TR
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
More