RMCF
Price
$1.59
Change
+$0.02 (+1.27%)
Updated
Jul 7, 12:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.86M
TR
Price
$35.42
Change
-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Updated
Jul 7, 02:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.23B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMCF vs TR

Header iconRMCF vs TR Comparison
Open Charts RMCF vs TRBanner chart's image
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
Price$1.59
Change+$0.02 (+1.27%)
Volume$1.66K
Capitalization22.86M
Tootsie Roll Industries
Price$35.42
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Volume$185
Capitalization2.23B
RMCF vs TR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMCF vs. TR commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMCF is a StrongBuy and TR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (RMCF: $1.57 vs. TR: $35.47)
Brand notoriety: RMCF and TR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMCF: 187% vs. TR: 57%
Market capitalization -- RMCF: $22.86M vs. TR: $2.23B
RMCF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $22.86M. TR’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TR is a better buy in the long-term than RMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TR is a better buy in the short-term than RMCF.

Price Growth

RMCF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +7.53% price change this week, while TR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +5.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

TR is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.05% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TR($2.23B) has a higher market cap than RMCF($22.9M). RMCF has higher P/E ratio than TR: RMCF (26.11) vs TR (24.04). TR YTD gains are higher at: 13.635 vs. RMCF (-35.391). TR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 138M vs. RMCF (-4.36M). TR has more cash in the bank: 171M vs. RMCF (2.08M). RMCF has less debt than TR: RMCF (2.87M) vs TR (15.9M). TR has higher revenues than RMCF: TR (769M) vs RMCF (28.8M).
RMCFTRRMCF / TR
Capitalization22.9M2.23B1%
EBITDA-4.36M138M-3%
Gain YTD-35.39113.635-260%
P/E Ratio26.1124.04109%
Revenue28.8M769M4%
Total Cash2.08M171M1%
Total Debt2.87M15.9M18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMCF vs TR: Fundamental Ratings
RMCF
TR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
9766
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1225
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TR's Valuation (62) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (79). This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.

TR's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (100). This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.

TR's SMR Rating (66) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (97). This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.

RMCF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as TR (49). This means that RMCF’s stock grew similarly to TR’s over the last 12 months.

RMCF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as TR (25). This means that RMCF’s stock grew similarly to TR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMCFTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VERI1.490.07
+4.93%
Veritone
HCSG15.140.20
+1.37%
Healthcare Services Group
CHTR416.974.71
+1.14%
Charter Communications
GPI466.001.38
+0.30%
Group 1 Automotive
NNVC1.38-0.01
-0.72%
NanoViricides

RMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCF and HLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCF and HLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMCF
1D Price
Change %
RMCF100%
-2.48%
HLF - RMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
TR - RMCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
DAR - RMCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
HSY - RMCF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
MZTI - RMCF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More

TR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TR has been loosely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TR jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TR
1D Price
Change %
TR100%
+0.54%
MDLZ - TR
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
KHC - TR
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
FLO - TR
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
SMPL - TR
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
HRL - TR
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
More