RMBS
Price
$98.45
Change
-$0.27 (-0.27%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.6B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TER
Price
$282.98
Change
+$137.79 (+94.90%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
44.32B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMBS vs TER

Header iconRMBS vs TER Comparison
Open Charts RMBS vs TERBanner chart's image
Rambus
Price$98.45
Change-$0.27 (-0.27%)
Volume$12.6M
Capitalization10.6B
Teradyne
Price$282.98
Change+$137.79 (+94.90%)
Volume$11.79M
Capitalization44.32B
RMBS vs TER Comparison Chart in %
RMBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TER
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMBS vs. TER commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBS is a Buy and TER is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (RMBS: $98.45 vs. TER: $282.98)
Brand notoriety: RMBS: Not notable vs. TER: Notable
RMBS represents the Semiconductors, while TER is part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMBS: 588% vs. TER: 378%
Market capitalization -- RMBS: $10.6B vs. TER: $44.32B
RMBS [@Semiconductors] is valued at $10.6B. TER’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $44.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.38T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $560.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $104.39B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $43.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMBS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTER’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TER’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than TER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMBS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TER’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TER’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TER is a better buy in the short-term than RMBS.

Price Growth

RMBS (@Semiconductors) experienced а -14.92% price change this week, while TER (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +18.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.44%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -2.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

RMBS is expected to report earnings on May 04, 2026.

TER is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-4.50% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Production Equipment (-2.29% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TER($44.3B) has a higher market cap than RMBS($10.6B). TER has higher P/E ratio than RMBS: TER (81.55) vs RMBS (46.88). TER YTD gains are higher at: 46.198 vs. RMBS (7.139). TER has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 648M vs. RMBS (310M). RMBS has more cash in the bank: 673M vs. TER (298M). RMBS has less debt than TER: RMBS (26.4M) vs TER (68.8M). TER has higher revenues than RMBS: TER (2.86B) vs RMBS (678M).
RMBSTERRMBS / TER
Capitalization10.6B44.3B24%
EBITDA310M648M48%
Gain YTD7.13946.19815%
P/E Ratio46.8881.5557%
Revenue678M2.86B24%
Total Cash673M298M226%
Total Debt26.4M68.8M38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMBS vs TER: Fundamental Ratings
RMBS
TER
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5527
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2131
SMR RATING
1..100
4652
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
392
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
267
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMBS's Valuation (82) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TER (83) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to TER’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TER (31) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to TER’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's SMR Rating (46) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TER (52) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to TER’s over the last 12 months.

TER's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBS (39) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TER’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

TER's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as RMBS (26) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TER’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMBSTER
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TER
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQDN27.030.93
+3.57%
ProShares UltraShort Top QQQ
SPVU59.740.83
+1.41%
Invesco S&P 500® Enhanced Value ETF
DFSV35.890.34
+0.96%
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
RULE25.55-0.07
-0.27%
Adaptive Core ETF
OCTW39.22-0.11
-0.29%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
-13.42%
LRCX - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
-3.12%
AMKR - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
-4.07%
KLIC - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
VECO - RMBS
75%
Closely correlated
-4.66%
KLAC - RMBS
74%
Closely correlated
-3.89%
More

TER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TER has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TER jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TER
1D Price
Change %
TER100%
+13.41%
STM - TER
74%
Closely correlated
-3.16%
TXN - TER
72%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
RMBS - TER
72%
Closely correlated
-13.42%
NXPI - TER
71%
Closely correlated
-4.51%
ADI - TER
71%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
More