RMBS
Price
$73.67
Change
+$0.18 (+0.24%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.93B
60 days until earnings call
TER
Price
$119.63
Change
-$0.98 (-0.81%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
19.03B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMBS vs TER

Header iconRMBS vs TER Comparison
Open Charts RMBS vs TERBanner chart's image
Rambus
Price$73.67
Change+$0.18 (+0.24%)
Volume$1.03M
Capitalization7.93B
Teradyne
Price$119.63
Change-$0.98 (-0.81%)
Volume$3.21M
Capitalization19.03B
RMBS vs TER Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMBS vs. TER commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBS is a Hold and TER is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (RMBS: $73.67 vs. TER: $119.63)
Brand notoriety: RMBS: Not notable vs. TER: Notable
RMBS represents the Semiconductors, while TER is part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMBS: 86% vs. TER: 80%
Market capitalization -- RMBS: $7.93B vs. TER: $19.03B
RMBS [@Semiconductors] is valued at $7.93B. TER’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $19.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.15T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $286.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $88.37B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $21.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMBS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTER’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TER’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than TER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMBS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TER’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TER’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TER is a better buy in the short-term than RMBS.

Price Growth

RMBS (@Semiconductors) experienced а -1.84% price change this week, while TER (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +2.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -3.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.86%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

TER is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-3.29% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Production Equipment (-1.03% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TER($19B) has a higher market cap than RMBS($7.93B). TER has higher P/E ratio than RMBS: TER (41.54) vs RMBS (34.93). RMBS YTD gains are higher at: 39.368 vs. TER (-4.749). TER has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 658M vs. RMBS (299M). RMBS has more cash in the bank: 595M vs. TER (368M). RMBS has less debt than TER: RMBS (27.9M) vs TER (74.5M). TER has higher revenues than RMBS: TER (2.83B) vs RMBS (645M).
RMBSTERRMBS / TER
Capitalization7.93B19B42%
EBITDA299M658M45%
Gain YTD39.368-4.749-829%
P/E Ratio34.9341.5484%
Revenue645M2.83B23%
Total Cash595M368M162%
Total Debt27.9M74.5M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMBS vs TER: Fundamental Ratings
RMBS
TER
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1123
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2875
SMR RATING
1..100
4551
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1147
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TER's Valuation (52) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as RMBS (78) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TER’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TER (75) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TER’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's SMR Rating (45) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TER (51) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to TER’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TER (42) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to TER’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TER (47) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TER’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMBSTER
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AOD9.100.02
+0.22%
abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
IRVH21.330.03
+0.15%
Global X Interest Rt Vol & Infl Hdg ETF
IJUL32.17-0.01
-0.05%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF July
MDPL27.09-0.13
-0.46%
Monarch Dividend Plus ETF
EBIT33.77-0.29
-0.85%
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with AMKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then AMKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
+0.25%
AMKR - RMBS
79%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
LRCX - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
KLIC - RMBS
75%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
KLAC - RMBS
73%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
VECO - RMBS
73%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
More

TER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TER has been closely correlated with NXPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TER jumps, then NXPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TER
1D Price
Change %
TER100%
-0.81%
NXPI - TER
72%
Closely correlated
-1.92%
ADI - TER
71%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
RMBS - TER
71%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
AMAT - TER
71%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
ON - TER
70%
Closely correlated
-2.35%
More