RMBL vs SPWH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBL is a StrongBuy and SPWH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RMBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSPWH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RMBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SPWH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RMBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPWH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RMBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SPWH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
RMBL (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +19.82% price change this week, while SPWH (@Specialty Stores) price change was +5.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
RMBL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
SPWH is expected to report earnings on Jun 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+1.80% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| RMBL | SPWH | RMBL / SPWH | |
| Capitalization | 227M | 116M | 196% |
| EBITDA | -55.9M | 48.4M | -115% |
| Gain YTD | -49.908 | -47.566 | 105% |
| P/E Ratio | 1.10 | 45.87 | 2% |
| Revenue | 1.37B | 1.32B | 104% |
| Total Cash | 58.9M | 2.89M | 2,036% |
| Total Debt | 772M | 550M | 140% |
RMBL | SPWH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 40 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RMBL's Valuation (46) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SPWH (65) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RMBL’s stock grew similarly to SPWH’s over the last 12 months.
RMBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SPWH (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RMBL’s stock grew similarly to SPWH’s over the last 12 months.
SPWH's SMR Rating (93) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RMBL (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SPWH’s stock grew similarly to RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
SPWH's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RMBL (94) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SPWH’s stock grew similarly to RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
SPWH's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SPWH’s stock grew significantly faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
| RMBL | SPWH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
RMBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBL has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMBL jumps, then AN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMBL | 100% | +8.80% | ||
| AN - RMBL | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| ABG - RMBL | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| ONEW - RMBL | 46% Loosely correlated | -5.00% | ||
| CWH - RMBL | 45% Loosely correlated | -5.64% | ||
| HZO - RMBL | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||
SPWH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPWH has been loosely correlated with CWH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPWH jumps, then CWH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPWH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPWH | 100% | -4.76% | ||
| CWH - SPWH | 38% Loosely correlated | -5.64% | ||
| FIVE - SPWH | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| WOOF - SPWH | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| ONEW - SPWH | 34% Loosely correlated | -5.00% | ||
| RMBL - SPWH | 33% Loosely correlated | +8.80% | ||
More | ||||