Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMBKX vs RPFGX
RMBKX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts RMBKX vs RPFGX
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$52.47
Change-$0.33 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.91M
RMBKX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMBKX vs. RPFGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBKX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. RMBKX (226M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than RMBKX: RPFGX (1.29) vs RMBKX (1.11). RMBKX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: RMBKX (26 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). RMBKX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RMBKX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: RPFGX (1000) vs RMBKX (2500). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.90 vs. RMBKX (13.05). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.48 vs. RMBKX (87.35).
| RMBKX | RPFGX | RMBKX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.94 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.94 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.045 | 18.434 | 27% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 226M | 1.16B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.29 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | 24.90 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.13 | 73.54 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.35 | 108.48 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.51 | 113.13 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement