RLYGF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.89M
ZCTSF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
20.46M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RLYGF vs ZCTSF

Header iconRLYGF vs ZCTSF Comparison
Open Charts RLYGF vs ZCTSFBanner chart's image
Riley Gold
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization3.89M
Zacatecas Silver
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.39K
Capitalization20.46M
RLYGF vs ZCTSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RLYGF vs. ZCTSF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLYGF is a Hold and ZCTSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (RLYGF: $0.10 vs. ZCTSF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: RLYGF and ZCTSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RLYGF: 63% vs. ZCTSF: 11%
Market capitalization -- RLYGF: $3.89M vs. ZCTSF: $20.46M
RLYGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.89M. ZCTSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $20.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RLYGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZCTSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RLYGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZCTSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZCTSF is a better buy in the long-term than RLYGF.

Price Growth

RLYGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +9.77% price change this week, while ZCTSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZCTSF($20.5M) has a higher market cap than RLYGF($3.89M). ZCTSF YTD gains are higher at: 28.302 vs. RLYGF (7.181). RLYGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49M vs. ZCTSF (-12M). RLYGF has more cash in the bank: 2.73M vs. ZCTSF (71K). RLYGF (0) and ZCTSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RLYGFZCTSFRLYGF / ZCTSF
Capitalization3.89M20.5M19%
EBITDA1.49M-12M-12%
Gain YTD7.18128.30225%
P/E Ratio2.31N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.73M71K3,842%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

RLYGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RLYGF and RNDXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RLYGF and RNDXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLYGF
1D Price
Change %
RLYGF100%
N/A
RNDXF - RLYGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCSUF - RLYGF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVMF - RLYGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.29%
TGMR - RLYGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1042.86%
ZCTSF - RLYGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.42%
More

ZCTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZCTSF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZCTSF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZCTSF
1D Price
Change %
ZCTSF100%
-4.42%
VITFF - ZCTSF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SSVRF - ZCTSF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
GSVRF - ZCTSF
30%
Poorly correlated
+13.07%
MRZLF - ZCTSF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
SLVRF - ZCTSF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More