RLYGF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.89M
SLVMF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
172.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RLYGF vs SLVMF

Header iconRLYGF vs SLVMF Comparison
Open Charts RLYGF vs SLVMFBanner chart's image
Riley Gold
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization3.89M
Silver Mines Ltd., Sydney
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization172.99M
RLYGF vs SLVMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RLYGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RLYGF vs. SLVMF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLYGF is a Hold and SLVMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RLYGF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RLYGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • RLYGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RLYGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RLYGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLVMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVMF is a better buy in the short-term than RLYGF.

Price Growth

RLYGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -18.19% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVMF($173M) has a higher market cap than RLYGF($3.89M). SLVMF has higher P/E ratio than RLYGF: SLVMF (55.56) vs RLYGF (2.31). SLVMF YTD gains are higher at: 87.773 vs. RLYGF (72.562). RLYGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49M vs. SLVMF (-7.48M). SLVMF has more cash in the bank: 12.1M vs. RLYGF (2.73M). SLVMF has higher revenues than RLYGF: SLVMF (159K) vs RLYGF (0).
RLYGFSLVMFRLYGF / SLVMF
Capitalization3.89M173M2%
EBITDA1.49M-7.48M-20%
Gain YTD72.56287.77383%
P/E Ratio2.3155.564%
Revenue0159K-
Total Cash2.73M12.1M23%
Total DebtN/A4.91M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RLYGFSLVMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RLYGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TILHX30.120.28
+0.94%
Nuveen Large Cap Growth I
DRISX17.400.08
+0.46%
North Square Small Cap Value I
PMDDX18.300.01
+0.05%
Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Inc C
RYRHX52.180.01
+0.02%
Rydex Russell 2000 H
MVALX41.11N/A
N/A
Meridian Contrarian Legacy

RLYGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RLYGF and RNDXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RLYGF and RNDXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLYGF
1D Price
Change %
RLYGF100%
N/A
RNDXF - RLYGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCSUF - RLYGF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVMF - RLYGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGMR - RLYGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.65%
ZCTSF - RLYGF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVMF and AUMBF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVMF and AUMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVMF
1D Price
Change %
SLVMF100%
N/A
AUMBF - SLVMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
BYAGF - SLVMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
ELRRF - SLVMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
CRTIF - SLVMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.41%
NVGLF - SLVMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More