RLYGF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.89M
RNDXF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Updated
May 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RLYGF vs RNDXF

Header iconRLYGF vs RNDXF Comparison
Open Charts RLYGF vs RNDXFBanner chart's image
Riley Gold
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization3.89M
Randgold & Exploration
Price$0.04
Change+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization3.69M
RLYGF vs RNDXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RLYGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RNDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RLYGF vs. RNDXF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLYGF is a Hold and RNDXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RLYGF: $0.16 vs. RNDXF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: RLYGF and RNDXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RLYGF: 27% vs. RNDXF: 1%
Market capitalization -- RLYGF: $3.89M vs. RNDXF: $3.69M
RLYGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.89M. RNDXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RLYGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRNDXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RLYGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RNDXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RNDXF is a better buy in the long-term than RLYGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RLYGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNDXF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RLYGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RNDXF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both RLYGF and RNDXF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

RLYGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -18.19% price change this week, while RNDXF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLYGF($3.89M) has a higher market cap than RNDXF($3.69M). RNDXF YTD gains are higher at: 108.500 vs. RLYGF (72.562). RLYGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49M vs. RNDXF (-21.31M). RNDXF has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. RLYGF (2.73M). RLYGF (0) and RNDXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RLYGFRNDXFRLYGF / RNDXF
Capitalization3.89M3.69M105%
EBITDA1.49M-21.31M-7%
Gain YTD72.562108.50067%
P/E Ratio2.31N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.73M106M3%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNDXF: Fundamental Ratings
RNDXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RLYGFRNDXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RLYGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RNDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBUX92.110.27
+0.29%
Starbucks Corp
BMRC22.70N/A
N/A
Bank of Marin Bancorp
INVA19.96-0.43
-2.11%
Innoviva
PAAS27.72-1.41
-4.84%
Pan American Silver Corp
AGMH2.19-0.23
-9.50%
AGM Group Holdings Inc

RLYGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RLYGF and RNDXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RLYGF and RNDXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLYGF
1D Price
Change %
RLYGF100%
N/A
RNDXF - RLYGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCSUF - RLYGF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVMF - RLYGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGMR - RLYGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.65%
ZCTSF - RLYGF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RNDXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RNDXF and SBSW have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RNDXF and SBSW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNDXF
1D Price
Change %
RNDXF100%
N/A
SBSW - RNDXF
30%
Poorly correlated
-7.15%
XTGRF - RNDXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
ETFLF - RNDXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
AMEGF - RNDXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.51%
RLYGF - RNDXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More