RLXXF
Price
$47.55
Change
+$2.26 (+4.99%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
84.8B
SCTBF
Price
$14.75
Change
-$0.73 (-4.72%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
8.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RLXXF vs SCTBF

Header iconRLXXF vs SCTBF Comparison
Open Charts RLXXF vs SCTBFBanner chart's image
RELX
Price$47.55
Change+$2.26 (+4.99%)
Volume$4.86K
Capitalization84.8B
Securitas A B
Price$14.75
Change-$0.73 (-4.72%)
Volume$294
Capitalization8.45B
RLXXF vs SCTBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RLXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RLXXF vs. SCTBF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLXXF is a StrongBuy and SCTBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RLXXF: $47.55 vs. SCTBF: $14.75)
Brand notoriety: RLXXF and SCTBF are both not notable
RLXXF represents the Office Equipment/Supplies, while SCTBF is part of the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RLXXF: 24% vs. SCTBF: 13%
Market capitalization -- RLXXF: $84.8B vs. SCTBF: $8.45B
RLXXF [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $84.8B. SCTBF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $8.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.35B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RLXXF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCTBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RLXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCTBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RLXXF is a better buy in the long-term than SCTBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RLXXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCTBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RLXXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCTBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both RLXXF and SCTBF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

RLXXF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +0.53% price change this week, while SCTBF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -4.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.13%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.63% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.32% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLXXF($84.8B) has a higher market cap than SCTBF($8.45B). RLXXF has higher P/E ratio than SCTBF: RLXXF (34.48) vs SCTBF (14.23). SCTBF YTD gains are higher at: 13.462 vs. RLXXF (8.337). SCTBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.6B vs. RLXXF (3.59B). SCTBF has more cash in the bank: 6.82B vs. RLXXF (211M). RLXXF has less debt than SCTBF: RLXXF (7.54B) vs SCTBF (44.3B). SCTBF has higher revenues than RLXXF: SCTBF (160B) vs RLXXF (9.53B).
RLXXFSCTBFRLXXF / SCTBF
Capitalization84.8B8.45B1,003%
EBITDA3.59B12.6B29%
Gain YTD8.33713.46262%
P/E Ratio34.4814.23242%
Revenue9.53B160B6%
Total Cash211M6.82B3%
Total Debt7.54B44.3B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RLXXF vs SCTBF: Fundamental Ratings
RLXXF
SCTBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1898
SMR RATING
1..100
3054
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCTBF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RLXXF (86). This means that SCTBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RLXXF’s over the last 12 months.

RLXXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCTBF (98). This means that RLXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

RLXXF's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as SCTBF (54). This means that RLXXF’s stock grew similarly to SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

SCTBF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as RLXXF (76). This means that SCTBF’s stock grew similarly to RLXXF’s over the last 12 months.

RLXXF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCTBF (98). This means that RLXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RLXXFSCTBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RLXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OVL51.980.42
+0.81%
Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF
TMFX21.650.14
+0.67%
Motley Fool Next ETF
VFH131.530.85
+0.65%
Vanguard Financials ETF
PAXS16.110.05
+0.31%
PIMCO Access Income Fund
SYNNF0.38N/A
N/A
Symphony International Holdings Ltd.

RLXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RLXXF and PCSV have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RLXXF and PCSV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLXXF
1D Price
Change %
RLXXF100%
+4.99%
PCSV - RLXXF
14%
Poorly correlated
-5.77%
SECCF - RLXXF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGSOF - RLXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSKIA - RLXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCTBF - RLXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCTBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCTBF and NAUH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCTBF and NAUH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCTBF
1D Price
Change %
SCTBF100%
N/A
NAUH - SCTBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKLIF - SCTBF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCGPY - SCTBF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDXOF - SCTBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RLXXF - SCTBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.99%
More