RLXXF
Price
$51.27
Change
-$3.23 (-5.93%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
63.74B
SCTBF
Price
$15.35
Change
+$0.35 (+2.33%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RLXXF vs SCTBF

Header iconRLXXF vs SCTBF Comparison
Open Charts RLXXF vs SCTBFBanner chart's image
RELX
Price$51.27
Change-$3.23 (-5.93%)
Volume$24.08K
Capitalization63.74B
Securitas A B
Price$15.35
Change+$0.35 (+2.33%)
Volume$1.63K
Capitalization4.87B
RLXXF vs SCTBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RLXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RLXXF vs. SCTBF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLXXF is a Hold and SCTBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RLXXF: $51.27 vs. SCTBF: $15.35)
Brand notoriety: RLXXF and SCTBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RLXXF: 489% vs. SCTBF: 13%
Market capitalization -- RLXXF: $63.74B vs. SCTBF: $4.87B
RLXXF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $63.74B. SCTBF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $4.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RLXXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCTBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RLXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCTBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RLXXF and SCTBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RLXXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCTBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RLXXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SCTBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCTBF is a better buy in the short-term than RLXXF.

Price Growth

RLXXF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -3.63% price change this week, while SCTBF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+1.02% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLXXF($63.7B) has a higher market cap than SCTBF($4.87B). RLXXF has higher P/E ratio than SCTBF: RLXXF (26.81) vs SCTBF (10.33). SCTBF YTD gains are higher at: 18.077 vs. RLXXF (16.815). SCTBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.65B vs. RLXXF (3.23B). SCTBF has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. RLXXF (99M). RLXXF has less debt than SCTBF: RLXXF (6.8B) vs SCTBF (50.9B). SCTBF has higher revenues than RLXXF: SCTBF (152B) vs RLXXF (9.08B).
RLXXFSCTBFRLXXF / SCTBF
Capitalization63.7B4.87B1,308%
EBITDA3.23B8.65B37%
Gain YTD16.81518.07793%
P/E Ratio26.8110.33260%
Revenue9.08B152B6%
Total Cash99M5.49B2%
Total Debt6.8B50.9B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RLXXF vs SCTBF: Fundamental Ratings
RLXXF
SCTBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1079
SMR RATING
1..100
8857
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4997
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCTBF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RLXXF (78). This means that SCTBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RLXXF’s over the last 12 months.

RLXXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCTBF (79). This means that RLXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

SCTBF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as RLXXF (88). This means that SCTBF’s stock grew similarly to RLXXF’s over the last 12 months.

SCTBF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as RLXXF (58). This means that SCTBF’s stock grew similarly to RLXXF’s over the last 12 months.

RLXXF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCTBF (97). This means that RLXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RLXXFSCTBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RLXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CET48.680.32
+0.67%
Central Securities Corp
XITK190.180.93
+0.49%
SPDR® FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
BDIV21.460.09
+0.41%
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF
REK16.420.02
+0.13%
ProShares Short Real Estate
BFZ10.41-0.03
-0.29%
BLACKROCK CA Municipal

RLXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RLXXF and PCSV have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RLXXF and PCSV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLXXF
1D Price
Change %
RLXXF100%
-5.92%
PCSV - RLXXF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
SECCF - RLXXF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGSOF - RLXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
RSKIA - RLXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCTBF - RLXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCTBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCTBF and NAUH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCTBF and NAUH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCTBF
1D Price
Change %
SCTBF100%
N/A
NAUH - SCTBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKLIF - SCTBF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCGPY - SCTBF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDXOF - SCTBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RLXXF - SCTBF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.92%
More