Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLNCX vs VFWPX
RLNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts C
Price$51.38
Change-$0.44 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$152.44
Change-$1.59 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
RLNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLNCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. RLNCX (1.13B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLNCX: VFWPX (2.70) vs RLNCX (1.86). RLNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLNCX (17 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLNCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.36 vs. RLNCX (22.55). RLNCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. VFWPX (39.87).
| RLNCX | VFWPX | RLNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.03 | 6,700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.03 | 6,767% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.472 | 29.164 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.70 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.55 | 25.36 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.67 | 50.03 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | 39.87 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.52 | 79.71 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers