Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLNAX vs VFWPX
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLNAX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts A
Price$51.34
Change-$0.45 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$152.44
Change-$1.59 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLNAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLNAX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. RLNAX (1.13B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLNAX: VFWPX (2.70) vs RLNAX (2.56). RLNAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLNAX (17 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLNAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLNAX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.36 vs. RLNAX (23.46). RLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.57 vs. VFWPX (39.87).
| RLNAX | VFWPX | RLNAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 4,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.03 | 4,267% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.286 | 29.164 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 2.70 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.46 | 25.36 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.97 | 50.03 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.57 | 39.87 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.00 | 79.71 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers