Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLNAX vs VFWPX
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLNAX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts A
Price$49.33
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.22B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$154.03
Change+$0.41 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.1B
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLNAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLNAX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 76.1B vs. RLNAX (1.22B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLNAX: VFWPX (2.69) vs RLNAX (2.54). RLNAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLNAX (17 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLNAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLNAX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.18 vs. RLNAX (19.76). RLNAX (34.54) and VFWPX (32.98) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RLNAX | VFWPX | RLNAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 4,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.03 | 4,267% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.288 | 29.164 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 76.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 2.69 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.76 | 28.18 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.83 | 49.71 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.54 | 32.98 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.93 | 78.85 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement