RLLWF
Price
$3.39
Change
-$0.02 (-0.59%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
TOTDY
Price
$25.44
Change
-$0.17 (-0.66%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
43 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

RLLWF vs TOTDY

Header iconRLLWF vs TOTDY Comparison
Open Charts RLLWF vs TOTDYBanner chart's image
Reliance Worldwide
Price$3.39
Change-$0.02 (-0.59%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Toto
Price$25.44
Change-$0.17 (-0.66%)
Volume$23.11K
CapitalizationN/A
RLLWF vs TOTDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
TOTDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RLLWF vs. TOTDY commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLLWF is a Hold and TOTDY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (RLLWF: $3.39 vs. TOTDY: $25.44)
Brand notoriety: RLLWF and TOTDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RLLWF: 21% vs. TOTDY: 161%
Market capitalization -- RLLWF: $3.01B vs. TOTDY: $5.25B
RLLWF [@Building Products] is valued at $3.01B. TOTDY’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $5.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $67.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RLLWF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTOTDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RLLWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TOTDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RLLWF is a better buy in the long-term than TOTDY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TOTDY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TOTDY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

RLLWF (@Building Products) experienced а -0.59% price change this week, while TOTDY (@Building Products) price change was -8.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

TOTDY is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-3.17% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOTDY($5.25B) has a higher market cap than RLLWF($3.01B). RLLWF has higher P/E ratio than TOTDY: RLLWF (24.40) vs TOTDY (18.48). RLLWF YTD gains are higher at: 16.897 vs. TOTDY (-1.767). TOTDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 65.6B vs. RLLWF (242M). TOTDY has more cash in the bank: 98.1B vs. RLLWF (28.4M). RLLWF has less debt than TOTDY: RLLWF (237M) vs TOTDY (24.7B). TOTDY has higher revenues than RLLWF: TOTDY (692B) vs RLLWF (1.23B).
RLLWFTOTDYRLLWF / TOTDY
Capitalization3.01B5.25B57%
EBITDA242M65.6B0%
Gain YTD16.897-1.767-956%
P/E Ratio24.4018.48132%
Revenue1.23B692B0%
Total Cash28.4M98.1B0%
Total Debt237M24.7B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RLLWF vs TOTDY: Fundamental Ratings
RLLWF
TOTDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9173
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
8564
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1488
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TOTDY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as RLLWF (31). This means that TOTDY’s stock grew similarly to RLLWF’s over the last 12 months.

RLLWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as TOTDY (100). This means that RLLWF’s stock grew similarly to TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.

TOTDY's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as RLLWF (85). This means that TOTDY’s stock grew similarly to RLLWF’s over the last 12 months.

RLLWF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as TOTDY (60). This means that RLLWF’s stock grew similarly to TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.

RLLWF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TOTDY (88). This means that RLLWF’s stock grew significantly faster than TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TOTDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TOTDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

RLLWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RLLWF and NDRBF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RLLWF and NDRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLLWF
1D Price
Change %
RLLWF100%
N/A
NDRBF - RLLWF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGSPF - RLLWF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSGRY - RLLWF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
TOTDY - RLLWF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
NPSGF - RLLWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TOTDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOTDY has been loosely correlated with DKILY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOTDY jumps, then DKILY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TOTDY
1D Price
Change %
TOTDY100%
-0.69%
DKILY - TOTDY
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
TOTDF - TOTDY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSGRY - TOTDY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
CODYY - TOTDY
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
GBERY - TOTDY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
More