Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLITX vs VFWPX
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLITX vs VFWPX
Lazard International Strategic Eq R6
Price$13.22
Change-$0.04 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$154.03
Change+$0.41 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.1B
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLITX vs. VFWPX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLITX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 76.1B vs. RLITX (1.55B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLITX: VFWPX (2.69) vs RLITX (1.47). RLITX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLITX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLITX (0.83) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLITX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLITX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.18 vs. RLITX (-2.51). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 32.98 vs. RLITX (-11.85).
| RLITX | VFWPX | RLITX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.929 | 29.164 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 76.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 2.69 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.51 | 28.18 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.61 | 49.71 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.85 | 32.98 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.89 | 78.85 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement