Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLITX vs VFWPX
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLITX vs VFWPX
Lazard International Strategic Eq R6
Price$16.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$140.90
Change+$0.22 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLITX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLITX is a Buy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. RLITX (1.88B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLITX: VFWPX (2.76) vs RLITX (1.66). RLITX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLITX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLITX (0.83) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLITX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLITX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. RLITX (1.93). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 44.42 vs. RLITX (30.05).
| RLITX | VFWPX | RLITX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.585 | 17.999 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 65.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 2.76 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.93 | 14.33 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.84 | 39.17 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.05 | 44.42 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.34 | 51.33 | 53% |