Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLITX vs VFWPX
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLITX vs VFWPX
Lazard International Strategic Eq R6
Price$16.53
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$154.03
Change+$0.76 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLITX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLITX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. RLITX (1.79B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLITX: VFWPX (2.70) vs RLITX (1.47). RLITX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLITX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLITX (0.83) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLITX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLITX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.36 vs. RLITX (7.16). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 39.87 vs. RLITX (17.20).
| RLITX | VFWPX | RLITX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.626 | 29.164 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 2.70 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.16 | 25.36 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.91 | 50.03 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.20 | 39.87 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.00 | 79.71 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers