Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLITX vs VFWPX
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLITX vs VFWPX
Lazard International Strategic Eq R6
Price$16.22
Change+$0.11 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$146.57
Change+$1.25 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLITX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLITX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. RLITX (1.83B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLITX: VFWPX (2.68) vs RLITX (1.50). RLITX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLITX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLITX (0.83) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLITX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLITX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.06 vs. RLITX (2.28). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 41.57 vs. RLITX (21.31).
| RLITX | VFWPX | RLITX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.326 | 22.748 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 71.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 2.68 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.28 | 19.06 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.10 | 44.91 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.31 | 41.57 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.07 | 70.72 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers