Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLISX vs RMFCX
RLISX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RLISX vs RMFCX
Russell Inv Equity Income S
Price$25.21
Change+$0.21 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.43B
RLISX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLISX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLISX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. RLISX (163M). RLISX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: RLISX (2.02) vs RMFCX (1.24). RLISX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: RLISX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RLISX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . RLISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RLISX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: RLISX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. RLISX (-3.94). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. RLISX (11.49).
| RLISX | RMFCX | RLISX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.765 | 13.245 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.24 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.94 | 6.41 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.19 | 42.10 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.49 | 63.20 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.03 | 103.62 | -22% |