RLGT
Price
$5.98
Change
+$0.02 (+0.34%)
Updated
Jul 22, 10:43 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
254.32M
51 days until earnings call
SFWL
Price
$0.98
Change
+$0.02 (+2.08%)
Updated
Jul 22, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
139.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RLGT vs SFWL

Header iconRLGT vs SFWL Comparison
Open Charts RLGT vs SFWLBanner chart's image
Radiant Logistics
Price$5.98
Change+$0.02 (+0.34%)
Volume$100
Capitalization254.32M
Shengfeng Development
Price$0.98
Change+$0.02 (+2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization139.26M
RLGT vs SFWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RLGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RLGT vs. SFWL commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLGT is a Buy and SFWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (RLGT: $5.96 vs. SFWL: $0.96)
Brand notoriety: RLGT and SFWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RLGT: 36% vs. SFWL: 239%
Market capitalization -- RLGT: $254.32M vs. SFWL: $139.26M
RLGT [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $254.32M. SFWL’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $139.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $126.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $13.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RLGT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSFWL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RLGT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SFWL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFWL is a better buy in the long-term than RLGT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RLGT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFWL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RLGT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFWL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RLGT is a better buy in the short-term than SFWL.

Price Growth

RLGT (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а -1.49% price change this week, while SFWL (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was -2.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

RLGT is expected to report earnings on Sep 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (+0.12% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLGT($254M) has a higher market cap than SFWL($139M). RLGT has higher P/E ratio than SFWL: RLGT (24.64) vs SFWL (13.23). RLGT (-11.045) and SFWL (-11.111) have similar YTD gains .
RLGTSFWLRLGT / SFWL
Capitalization254M139M183%
EBITDA35.5MN/A-
Gain YTD-11.045-11.11199%
P/E Ratio24.6413.23186%
Revenue888MN/A-
Total Cash32.9MN/A-
Total Debt59.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RLGT: Fundamental Ratings
RLGT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RLGTSFWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RLGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCTF12.200.09
+0.74%
Bancorp 34, Inc.
NGKIF12.45N/A
N/A
NGK Insulators Ltd.
SPHXF0.42N/A
N/A
SM Prime Holdings, Inc.
KJFI0.11N/A
N/A
Comjoyful International Co
SESMF48.25N/A
N/A
SUSS MICROTEC SE

RLGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RLGT has been loosely correlated with HUBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RLGT jumps, then HUBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLGT
1D Price
Change %
RLGT100%
+1.02%
HUBG - RLGT
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
JBHT - RLGT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
LSTR - RLGT
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
FDX - RLGT
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
FWRD - RLGT
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
More

SFWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFWL and FDX have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFWL and FDX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFWL
1D Price
Change %
SFWL100%
+3.20%
FDX - SFWL
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
UPS - SFWL
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
GXO - SFWL
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
FWRD - SFWL
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
RLGT - SFWL
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
More