Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RWMHX
RLCAX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RWMHX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$8.93
Change-$0.33 (-3.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.24M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.01
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
RLCAX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RWMHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. RLCAX (183M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than RLCAX: RWMHX (1.36) vs RLCAX (1.29). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: RLCAX (18 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). RLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RWMHX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. RLCAX (4.87). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. RLCAX (-0.37).
| RLCAX | RWMHX | RLCAX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.41 | 251% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.41 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.717 | 1.523 | 244% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.36 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.87 | 5.40 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.75 | 30.10 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.37 | 37.20 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.01 | 96.94 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers