Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMFCX
RLCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMFCX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$9.34
Change+$0.09 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.65M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
RLCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. RLCAX (177M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: RLCAX (1.32) vs RMFCX (1.20). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: RLCAX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RLCAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMFCX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. RLCAX (-1.97). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.04 vs. RLCAX (18.45).
| RLCAX | RMFCX | RLCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.058 | 14.613 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.20 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.97 | 5.54 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.90 | 39.44 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.45 | 61.04 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.40 | 88.77 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers