Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMEBX
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$8.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.93M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.71
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. RLCAX (180M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: RLCAX (1.30) vs RMEBX (1.03). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: RLCAX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMEBX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. RLCAX (2.47). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.21 vs. RLCAX (0.98).
| RLCAX | RMEBX | RLCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.448 | 9.599 | 36% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.03 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.47 | 7.97 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.95 | 28.41 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.98 | 45.21 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.75 | 90.05 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers