RLBY
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
10.91M
TCCPY
Price
$6.62
Change
+$0.28 (+4.42%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.37B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RLBY vs TCCPY

Header iconRLBY vs TCCPY Comparison
Open Charts RLBY vs TCCPYBanner chart's image
Reliability
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization10.91M
Technopro Holdings
Price$6.62
Change+$0.28 (+4.42%)
Volume$15.15K
Capitalization3.37B
RLBY vs TCCPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCCPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RLBY vs. TCCPY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBY is a Hold and TCCPY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RLBY: $0.04 vs. TCCPY: $6.62)
Brand notoriety: RLBY and TCCPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RLBY: 4% vs. TCCPY: 17%
Market capitalization -- RLBY: $10.91M vs. TCCPY: $3.37B
RLBY [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $10.91M. TCCPY’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $3.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $78.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $1.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RLBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCCPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RLBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCCPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCCPY is a better buy in the long-term than RLBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RLBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCCPY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RLBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TCCPY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TCCPY is a better buy in the short-term than RLBY.

Price Growth

RLBY (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -13.17% price change this week, while TCCPY (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +4.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (-2.01% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCCPY($3.37B) has a higher market cap than RLBY($10.9M). TCCPY YTD gains are higher at: 80.381 vs. RLBY (-47.655). TCCPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 28.3B vs. RLBY (-547K). TCCPY has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. RLBY (262K). RLBY has less debt than TCCPY: RLBY (70K) vs TCCPY (19.6B). TCCPY has higher revenues than RLBY: TCCPY (230B) vs RLBY (22.1M).
RLBYTCCPYRLBY / TCCPY
Capitalization10.9M3.37B0%
EBITDA-547K28.3B-0%
Gain YTD-47.65580.381-59%
P/E RatioN/A31.88-
Revenue22.1M230B0%
Total Cash262K46.4B0%
Total Debt70K19.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RLBY vs TCCPY: Fundamental Ratings
RLBY
TCCPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10042
SMR RATING
1..100
9517
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RLBY's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as TCCPY (66). This means that RLBY’s stock grew similarly to TCCPY’s over the last 12 months.

TCCPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RLBY (100). This means that TCCPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RLBY’s over the last 12 months.

TCCPY's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RLBY (95). This means that TCCPY’s stock grew significantly faster than RLBY’s over the last 12 months.

TCCPY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as RLBY (63). This means that TCCPY’s stock grew similarly to RLBY’s over the last 12 months.

RLBY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as TCCPY (15). This means that RLBY’s stock grew similarly to TCCPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RLBYTCCPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCCPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARKG26.910.24
+0.90%
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF
JSTC20.120.14
+0.69%
Adasina Social Justice All Cp Glbl ETF
AGQI15.870.07
+0.44%
First Trust Active Gbl Qual Inc ETF
MARO17.37N/A
N/A
Yieldmax Mara Option Income Strategy ETF
QBUF28.65-0.01
-0.03%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffr ETF - Qt

RLBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RLBY and MPGPF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RLBY and MPGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLBY
1D Price
Change %
RLBY100%
N/A
MPGPF - RLBY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAYPY - RLBY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCCPY - RLBY
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.42%
ZIP - RLBY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWLPF - RLBY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TCCPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCCPY and AHEXY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCCPY and AHEXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCCPY
1D Price
Change %
TCCPY100%
+4.42%
AHEXY - TCCPY
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
ZIP - TCCPY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGDLF - TCCPY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RLBY - TCCPY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RANJY - TCCPY
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
More