RLBY
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
13.42M
TCCPY
Price
$6.54
Change
+$0.01 (+0.15%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RLBY vs TCCPY

Header iconRLBY vs TCCPY Comparison
Open Charts RLBY vs TCCPYBanner chart's image
Reliability
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization13.42M
Technopro Holdings
Price$6.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
Volume$16K
Capitalization3.42B
RLBY vs TCCPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCCPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RLBY vs. TCCPY commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBY is a Hold and TCCPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (RLBY: $0.04 vs. TCCPY: $6.54)
Brand notoriety: RLBY and TCCPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RLBY: 100% vs. TCCPY: 42%
Market capitalization -- RLBY: $13.42M vs. TCCPY: $3.42B
RLBY [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $13.42M. TCCPY’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $3.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $78.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $1.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RLBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCCPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RLBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCCPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCCPY is a better buy in the long-term than RLBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RLBY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCCPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RLBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TCCPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RLBY is a better buy in the short-term than TCCPY.

Price Growth

RLBY (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TCCPY (@Other Consumer Services) price change was -0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +5.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+5.15% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCCPY($3.42B) has a higher market cap than RLBY($13.4M). TCCPY YTD gains are higher at: 78.202 vs. RLBY (-35.647). TCCPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 28.3B vs. RLBY (-492K). TCCPY has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. RLBY (264K). RLBY has less debt than TCCPY: RLBY (40K) vs TCCPY (19.6B). TCCPY has higher revenues than RLBY: TCCPY (230B) vs RLBY (23.4M).
RLBYTCCPYRLBY / TCCPY
Capitalization13.4M3.42B0%
EBITDA-492K28.3B-0%
Gain YTD-35.64778.202-46%
P/E RatioN/A31.15-
Revenue23.4M230B0%
Total Cash264K46.4B0%
Total Debt40K19.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RLBY vs TCCPY: Fundamental Ratings
RLBY
TCCPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
9417
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RLBY's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as TCCPY (63). This means that RLBY’s stock grew similarly to TCCPY’s over the last 12 months.

TCCPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RLBY (100). This means that TCCPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RLBY’s over the last 12 months.

TCCPY's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RLBY (94). This means that TCCPY’s stock grew significantly faster than RLBY’s over the last 12 months.

RLBY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as TCCPY (39). This means that RLBY’s stock grew similarly to TCCPY’s over the last 12 months.

RLBY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as TCCPY (15). This means that RLBY’s stock grew similarly to TCCPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RLBYTCCPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCCPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REEIX15.610.02
+0.13%
RBC Emerging Markets Equity I
USSCX33.28N/A
N/A
Victory Science & Technology
RUBEUR0.01N/A
N/A
Russia Ruble - Euro
GUSYX20.52-0.05
-0.24%
Grandeur Peak US Stalwarts Institutional
HESAX45.51-0.16
-0.35%
Horizon Defensive Core Advisor

RLBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RLBY and MPGPF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RLBY and MPGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLBY
1D Price
Change %
RLBY100%
N/A
MPGPF - RLBY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAYPY - RLBY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCCPY - RLBY
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
ZIP - RLBY
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
CWLPF - RLBY
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
More

TCCPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCCPY and AHEXY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCCPY and AHEXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCCPY
1D Price
Change %
TCCPY100%
+0.08%
AHEXY - TCCPY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
ZIP - TCCPY
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
TGDLF - TCCPY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RLBY - TCCPY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RANJY - TCCPY
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More