Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WFALX
RLBGX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WFALX
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.49
Change-$0.08 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation C
Price$21.60
Change-$0.06 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
RLBGX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WFALX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Buy and WFALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. WFALX (1.27B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than WFALX: RLBGX (2.13) vs WFALX (0.52). RLBGX was incepted earlier than WFALX: RLBGX (16 years) vs WFALX (27 years). WFALX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFALX (12.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: RLBGX (250) vs WFALX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.36 vs. WFALX (-10.47). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.09 vs. WFALX (-8.20).
| RLBGX | WFALX | RLBGX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.82 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.86 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.990 | 5.697 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256B | 1.27B | 20,189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 0.52 | 409% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.36 | -10.47 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.72 | -9.54 | -322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.09 | -8.20 | -489% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.65 | 19.10 | 365% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement