Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WFALX
RLBGX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WFALX
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.84
Change+$0.23 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation C
Price$21.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
RLBGX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WFALX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Buy and WFALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. WFALX (1.27B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than WFALX: RLBGX (2.09) vs WFALX (0.51). RLBGX was incepted earlier than WFALX: RLBGX (16 years) vs WFALX (27 years). WFALX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFALX (12.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: RLBGX (250) vs WFALX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. WFALX (-9.80). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.80 vs. WFALX (-8.32).
| RLBGX | WFALX | RLBGX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.82 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.86 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.633 | 6.578 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 259B | 1.27B | 20,442% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 0.51 | 408% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.35 | -9.80 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.14 | -2.21 | -1,865% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.80 | -8.32 | -502% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.87 | 24.71 | 319% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement