Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WFAIX
RLBGX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WFAIX
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.49
Change-$0.08 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Admin
Price$40.80
Change-$0.10 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
RLBGX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WFAIX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Buy and WFAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. WFAIX (1.27B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: RLBGX (2.13) vs WFAIX (1.00). RLBGX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: RLBGX (16 years) vs WFAIX (26 years). WFAIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFAIX (12.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: RLBGX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.36 vs. WFAIX (-1.52). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.09 vs. WFAIX (8.26).
| RLBGX | WFAIX | RLBGX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.90 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.04 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.990 | 6.334 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256B | 1.27B | 20,189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.00 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.36 | -1.52 | -549% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.72 | 5.37 | 572% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.09 | 8.26 | 485% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.65 | 44.28 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement