Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WEBCX
RLBGX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$36.90
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.47
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.11M
RLBGX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WEBCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. WEBCX (34.1M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: RLBGX (2.15) vs WEBCX (1.22). RLBGX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBGX (16 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBGX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. WEBCX (0.62). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. WEBCX (3.26).
| RLBGX | WEBCX | RLBGX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.39 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.39 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.259 | 4.202 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252B | 34.1M | 739,003% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 1.22 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.24 | 0.62 | 1,337% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.31 | 10.64 | 341% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | 3.26 | 1,332% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.54 | -8.56 | -800% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement