Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WEBCX
RLBGX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$35.65
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.19
Change-$0.09 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.27M
RLBGX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WEBCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. WEBCX (33.3M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: RLBGX (2.23) vs WEBCX (1.23). RLBGX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBGX (16 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBGX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.63 vs. WEBCX (-1.35). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.35 vs. WEBCX (-0.32).
| RLBGX | WEBCX | RLBGX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.39 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.39 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.592 | 1.080 | 425% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 244B | 33.3M | 732,733% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 1.23 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | -1.35 | -416% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.78 | 9.91 | 341% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.35 | -0.32 | -12,571% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.87 | -12.08 | -504% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement