Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WBCCX
RLBGX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$35.65
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.53B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.32
Change-$0.09 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.66M
RLBGX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WBCCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Buy and WBCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 247B vs. WBCCX (33.7M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBGX (2.23) vs WBCCX (0.52). RLBGX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBGX (16 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBGX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.63 vs. WBCCX (-2.11). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.35 vs. WBCCX (-3.56).
| RLBGX | WBCCX | RLBGX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 2.14 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 2.14 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.592 | 0.780 | 589% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247B | 33.7M | 732,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 0.52 | 427% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | -2.11 | -266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.78 | 7.53 | 448% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.35 | -3.56 | -1,132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.87 | -16.25 | -375% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement