Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WBCCX
RLBGX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.23
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.66
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.91M
RLBGX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WBCCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Buy and WBCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. WBCCX (33.9M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBGX (2.15) vs WBCCX (0.50). RLBGX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBGX (16 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBGX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.64 vs. WBCCX (0.16). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.65 vs. WBCCX (-2.23).
| RLBGX | WBCCX | RLBGX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 2.14 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 2.14 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.228 | 4.203 | 220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 254B | 33.9M | 749,263% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 0.50 | 425% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.64 | 0.16 | 6,551% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.96 | 7.12 | 505% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.65 | -2.23 | -1,869% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.54 | -12.44 | -551% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement