Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WFALX
RLBFX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WFALX
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation C
Price$22.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
RLBFX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WFALX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Buy and WFALX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. WFALX (1.28B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WFALX: RLBFX (2.00) vs WFALX (0.52). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WFALX: RLBFX (23 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFALX (12.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: RLBFX (250) vs WFALX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. WFALX (-10.84). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. WFALX (-7.10).
| RLBFX | WFALX | RLBFX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.82 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.86 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.890 | 8.898 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265B | 1.28B | 20,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 0.52 | 382% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.05 | -10.84 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.85 | 4.19 | 1,237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.90 | -7.10 | -618% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.80 | 24.61 | 320% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement