Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WFALX
RLBFX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WFALX
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation C
Price$22.34
Change-$0.29 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
RLBFX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WFALX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Buy and WFALX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. WFALX (1.27B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WFALX: RLBFX (1.97) vs WFALX (0.52). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WFALX: RLBFX (24 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFALX (12.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: RLBFX (250) vs WFALX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. WFALX (-10.02). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. WFALX (-6.97).
| RLBFX | WFALX | RLBFX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.82 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.86 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.507 | 10.857 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269B | 1.27B | 21,164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 0.52 | 381% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.28 | -10.02 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.74 | 1.31 | 3,403% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.06 | -6.97 | -618% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.39 | 27.48 | 296% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement