Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs TSUMX
RLBFX vs TSUMX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs TSUMX
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.94
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
Thornburg Summit I
Price$14.52
Change+$0.07 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.37M
RLBFX vs TSUMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. TSUMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a StrongBuy and TSUMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. TSUMX (99.4M). TSUMX (1.97) and RLBFX (1.93) have matching dividends . RLBFX was incepted earlier than TSUMX: RLBFX (24 years) vs TSUMX (7 years). TSUMX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). TSUMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.54 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSUMX: RLBFX (250) vs TSUMX (2500000). TSUMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.25 vs. RLBFX (9.63). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.86 vs. TSUMX (29.88).
| RLBFX | TSUMX | RLBFX / TSUMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.71 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.17 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.889 | 13.793 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269B | 99.4M | 270,624% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.97 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.63 | 12.25 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.38 | 37.08 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.86 | 29.88 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement