Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBEX vs WEBCX
RLBEX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBEX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.37
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.64B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.56
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.68M
RLBEX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBEX vs. WEBCX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBEX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. WEBCX (33.7M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: RLBEX (1.81) vs WEBCX (1.21). RLBEX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBEX (23 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBEX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.79 vs. WEBCX (-0.41). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.10 vs. WEBCX (0.19).
| RLBEX | WEBCX | RLBEX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.39 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.39 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.708 | 5.297 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256B | 33.7M | 759,644% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.21 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.79 | -0.41 | -1,924% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.08 | 4.97 | 625% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.10 | 0.19 | 19,603% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.61 | -4.13 | -1,807% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement