Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WEBCX
RLBCX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.26
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.75B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.69
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.83M
RLBCX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WEBCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Hold and WEBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. WEBCX (33.8M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: RLBCX (1.53) vs WEBCX (1.19). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBCX (23 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBCX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. WEBCX (-0.84). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.60 vs. WEBCX (3.55).
| RLBCX | WEBCX | RLBCX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.918 | 6.751 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 33.8M | 778,107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.19 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.77 | -0.84 | -920% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.08 | 19.42 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.60 | 3.55 | 1,202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.23 | -0.22 | -35,722% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement