Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WEBCX
RLBCX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.94
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$9.59
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.95M
RLBCX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WEBCX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a StrongBuy and WEBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. WEBCX (32.9M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: RLBCX (1.44) vs WEBCX (1.33). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBCX (24 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBCX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. WEBCX (-7.08). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.90 vs. WEBCX (-9.41).
| RLBCX | WEBCX | RLBCX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.876 | -4.234 | -422% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269B | 32.9M | 817,629% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.33 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.24 | -7.08 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.57 | 3.82 | 1,113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.90 | -9.41 | -413% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.32 | -7.23 | -1,070% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement