Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WEBCX
RLBCX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.64B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.56
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.68M
RLBCX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WEBCX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. WEBCX (33.7M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: RLBCX (1.56) vs WEBCX (1.21). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBCX (23 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBCX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.49 vs. WEBCX (-0.41). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.35 vs. WEBCX (0.19).
| RLBCX | WEBCX | RLBCX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.537 | 5.297 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256B | 33.7M | 759,644% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.21 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.49 | -0.41 | -1,849% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.06 | 4.97 | 605% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.35 | 0.19 | 18,705% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.27 | -4.13 | -1,678% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement