Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WEBCX
RLBCX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.64
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.47
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.11M
RLBCX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WEBCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. WEBCX (34.1M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: RLBCX (1.57) vs WEBCX (1.22). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBCX (23 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBCX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.52 vs. WEBCX (0.62). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.59 vs. WEBCX (3.26).
| RLBCX | WEBCX | RLBCX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.917 | 4.202 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252B | 34.1M | 739,003% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.22 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.52 | 0.62 | 1,220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.01 | 10.64 | 320% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.59 | 3.26 | 1,213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.14 | -8.56 | -726% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement