Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WEBAX
RLBCX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WEBAX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
TETON Westwood Balanced AAA
Price$10.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.51M
RLBCX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WEBAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Buy and WEBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. WEBAX (33.5M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WEBAX: RLBCX (1.49) vs WEBAX (1.18). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: RLBCX (23 years) vs WEBAX (34 years). WEBAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBAX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: RLBCX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. WEBAX (-1.94). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.24 vs. WEBAX (0.14).
| RLBCX | WEBAX | RLBCX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.364 | 6.919 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265B | 33.5M | 791,045% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.18 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.34 | -1.94 | -431% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.26 | 17.38 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.24 | 0.14 | 27,984% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.18 | -3.28 | -2,204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement