Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WEBAX
RLBCX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WEBAX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.13
Change-$0.57 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
TETON Westwood Balanced AAA
Price$9.61
Change-$1.04 (-9.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.16M
RLBCX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WEBAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Hold and WEBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. WEBAX (32.2M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WEBAX: RLBCX (1.62) vs WEBAX (1.33). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: RLBCX (24 years) vs WEBAX (34 years). WEBAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). WEBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: RLBCX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. WEBAX (-5.61). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.82 vs. WEBAX (-10.85).
| RLBCX | WEBAX | RLBCX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.445 | 2.017 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270B | 32.2M | 838,509% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.33 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.97 | -5.61 | -196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.49 | 3.54 | 1,001% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.82 | -10.85 | -312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.49 | -2.46 | -3,437% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement