Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WBCCX
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.51M
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WBCCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Buy and WBCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. WBCCX (33.5M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBCX (1.49) vs WBCCX (0.48). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBCX (23 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBCX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. WBCCX (-2.52). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.24 vs. WBCCX (-2.96).
| RLBCX | WBCCX | RLBCX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.364 | 6.308 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265B | 33.5M | 791,045% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 0.48 | 310% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.34 | -2.52 | -331% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.26 | 14.88 | 331% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.24 | -2.96 | -1,357% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.18 | -8.93 | -808% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement