Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WBCCX
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.80
Change-$0.48 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.86
Change-$0.10 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.6M
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WBCCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Buy and WBCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. WBCCX (33.6M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBCX (1.46) vs WBCCX (0.48). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBCX (23 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBCX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.39 vs. WBCCX (-2.23). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.74 vs. WBCCX (-4.33).
| RLBCX | WBCCX | RLBCX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.512 | 7.287 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269B | 33.6M | 800,595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.48 | 307% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.39 | -2.23 | -376% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.39 | 8.50 | 487% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.74 | -4.33 | -871% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.87 | -7.79 | -910% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement