Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WBCCX
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.73
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.81
Change+$0.06 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.88M
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WBCCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Buy and WBCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. WBCCX (33.9M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBCX (1.53) vs WBCCX (0.49). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBCX (23 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBCX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. WBCCX (-0.47). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. WBCCX (-2.34).
| RLBCX | WBCCX | RLBCX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.127 | 5.767 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 259B | 33.9M | 764,012% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.49 | 310% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.58 | -0.47 | -2,023% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.72 | 9.27 | 418% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.90 | -2.34 | -1,616% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.02 | -7.82 | -921% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement