Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WBCCX
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.45
Change-$0.49 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$9.67
Change-$0.07 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.59M
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WBCCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a StrongBuy and WBCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. WBCCX (32.6M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBCX (1.44) vs WBCCX (0.54). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBCX (24 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). WBCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBCX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. WBCCX (-7.54). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.90 vs. WBCCX (-12.28).
| RLBCX | WBCCX | RLBCX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.876 | -4.656 | -384% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269B | 32.6M | 825,153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.54 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.24 | -7.54 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.57 | 1.76 | 2,412% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.90 | -12.28 | -317% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.32 | -11.94 | -647% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement