Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBBX vs WEBCX
RLBBX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBBX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$38.04
Change-$0.58 (-1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$9.70
Change-$1.05 (-9.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.06M
RLBBX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBBX vs. WEBCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBBX is a Hold and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. WEBCX (32.1M). WEBCX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: WEBCX (1.32) vs RLBBX (1.23). RLBBX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBBX (24 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). WEBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBBX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.49 vs. WEBCX (-5.65). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 31.41 vs. WEBCX (-10.71).
| RLBBX | WEBCX | RLBBX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.39 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.39 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.396 | 1.998 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270B | 32.1M | 841,121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.32 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.49 | -5.65 | -186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.68 | 3.51 | 961% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.41 | -10.71 | -293% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.44 | -3.33 | -2,388% |