Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBBX vs WBCCX
RLBBX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBBX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$38.66
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.51M
RLBBX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBBX vs. WBCCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBBX is a Buy and WBCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. WBCCX (33.5M). RLBBX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBBX (1.11) vs WBCCX (0.48). RLBBX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBBX (23 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). RLBBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBBX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. WBCCX (-2.52). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. WBCCX (-2.96).
| RLBBX | WBCCX | RLBBX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.14 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.14 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.938 | 6.308 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265B | 33.5M | 791,045% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.48 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | -2.52 | -311% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.43 | 14.88 | 319% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.69 | -2.96 | -1,272% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.64 | -8.93 | -758% |