Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WFALX
RLBAX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WFALX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation C
Price$22.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
RLBAX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WFALX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and WFALX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. WFALX (1.28B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than WFALX: RLBAX (1.10) vs WFALX (0.52). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WFALX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFALX (12.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: RLBAX (250) vs WFALX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. WFALX (-10.84). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. WFALX (-7.10).
| RLBAX | WFALX | RLBAX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.82 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.86 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.947 | 8.898 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265B | 1.28B | 20,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.52 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | -10.84 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.39 | 4.19 | 1,130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.69 | -7.10 | -531% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.66 | 24.61 | 275% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement