Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WFAIX
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WFAIX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Admin
Price$41.98
Change+$0.13 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WFAIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and WFAIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. WFAIX (1.28B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: RLBAX (1.10) vs WFAIX (0.97). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WFAIX (26 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than WFAIX (1.04). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFAIX (12.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: RLBAX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. WFAIX (-1.95). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. WFAIX (9.64).
| RLBAX | WFAIX | RLBAX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.90 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.04 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.947 | 9.703 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265B | 1.28B | 20,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.97 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | -1.95 | -402% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.39 | 21.62 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.69 | 9.64 | 391% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.66 | 50.90 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement