Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WEBCX
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.64B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.56
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.68M
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WEBCX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. WEBCX (33.7M). WEBCX (1.21) and RLBAX (1.17) have matching dividends . RLBAX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBAX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. WEBCX (-0.41). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.83 vs. WEBCX (0.19).
| RLBAX | WEBCX | RLBAX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.214 | 5.297 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256B | 33.7M | 759,644% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.21 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | -0.41 | -1,721% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.56 | 4.97 | 575% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.83 | 0.19 | 17,408% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.02 | -4.13 | -1,575% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement