Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WEBCX
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$39.42
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$9.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.1M
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WEBCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a StrongBuy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. WEBCX (33.1M). WEBCX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: WEBCX (1.33) vs RLBAX (1.07). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBAX (24 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBAX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. WEBCX (-8.80). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.78 vs. WEBCX (-9.99).
| RLBAX | WEBCX | RLBAX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.776 | -4.933 | -320% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269B | 33.1M | 812,689% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.33 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | -8.80 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.26 | 1.79 | 2,077% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.78 | -9.99 | -348% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.67 | -10.22 | -652% |