Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WEBCX
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.52
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.91M
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WEBCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. WEBCX (33.9M). WEBCX (1.22) and RLBAX (1.18) have matching dividends . RLBAX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBAX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. WEBCX (1.00). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.28 vs. WEBCX (1.18).
| RLBAX | WEBCX | RLBAX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.565 | 4.700 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 254B | 33.9M | 749,263% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.22 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.42 | 1.00 | 941% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.14 | 9.61 | 334% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.28 | 1.18 | 2,983% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.06 | -7.83 | -742% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement