Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WEBCX
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.14
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.75B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.69
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.83M
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WEBCX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and WEBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. WEBCX (33.8M). WEBCX (1.19) and RLBAX (1.15) have matching dividends . RLBAX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBAX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. WEBCX (-0.84). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.00 vs. WEBCX (3.55).
| RLBAX | WEBCX | RLBAX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.531 | 6.751 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 33.8M | 778,107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.19 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | -0.84 | -860% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.19 | 19.42 | 248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.00 | 3.55 | 1,128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.51 | -0.22 | -33,594% |