Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WEBCX
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.51M
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WEBCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. WEBCX (33.5M). WEBCX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: WEBCX (1.17) vs RLBAX (1.10). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBAX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. WEBCX (-1.92). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. WEBCX (0.28).
| RLBAX | WEBCX | RLBAX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.947 | 6.850 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265B | 33.5M | 791,045% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.17 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | -1.92 | -408% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.39 | 17.31 | 274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.69 | 0.28 | 13,500% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.66 | -4.08 | -1,660% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement