Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WEBAX
RLBAX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WEBAX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
TETON Westwood Balanced AAA
Price$10.49
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.72M
RLBAX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WEBAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and WEBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. WEBAX (33.7M). WEBAX (1.22) and RLBAX (1.17) have matching dividends . RLBAX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WEBAX (34 years). WEBAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBAX (36.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: RLBAX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. WEBAX (-0.13). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. WEBAX (-0.15).
| RLBAX | WEBAX | RLBAX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.243 | 5.451 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256B | 33.7M | 759,644% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.22 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | -0.13 | -5,667% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.06 | 3.63 | 745% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.77 | -0.15 | -22,925% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.12 | -6.61 | -894% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement