Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WEBAX
RLBAX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WEBAX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.14
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.04B
TETON Westwood Balanced AAA
Price$10.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.81M
RLBAX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WEBAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and WEBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. WEBAX (33.8M). WEBAX (1.20) and RLBAX (1.15) have matching dividends . RLBAX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WEBAX (34 years). WEBAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBAX (36.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: RLBAX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. WEBAX (-0.85). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.00 vs. WEBAX (3.40).
| RLBAX | WEBAX | RLBAX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.531 | 6.818 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262B | 33.8M | 775,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.20 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | -0.85 | -853% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.19 | 19.39 | 248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.00 | 3.40 | 1,176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.51 | 0.63 | 11,792% |