Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs TSUMX
RLBAX vs TSUMX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs TSUMX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
Thornburg Summit I
Price$14.43
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.6M
RLBAX vs TSUMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. TSUMX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and TSUMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. TSUMX (96.6M). TSUMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: TSUMX (2.09) vs RLBAX (1.17). RLBAX was incepted earlier than TSUMX: RLBAX (23 years) vs TSUMX (6 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than TSUMX (1.17). TSUMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.54 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSUMX: RLBAX (250) vs TSUMX (2500000). TSUMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.99 vs. RLBAX (7.15). RLBAX (33.77) and TSUMX (33.73) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RLBAX | TSUMX | RLBAX / TSUMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.71 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.243 | 13.472 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256B | 96.6M | 265,010% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 2.09 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | 11.99 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.06 | 34.52 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.77 | 33.73 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement