Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs TSUMX
RLBAX vs TSUMX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs TSUMX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.59
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.73B
Thornburg Summit I
Price$14.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.39M
RLBAX vs TSUMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. TSUMX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and TSUMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 258B vs. TSUMX (97.4M). TSUMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: TSUMX (2.03) vs RLBAX (1.15). RLBAX was incepted earlier than TSUMX: RLBAX (23 years) vs TSUMX (7 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than TSUMX (1.17). TSUMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.54 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSUMX: RLBAX (250) vs TSUMX (2500000). TSUMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.69 vs. RLBAX (9.12). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. TSUMX (32.35).
| RLBAX | TSUMX | RLBAX / TSUMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.71 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.805 | 14.180 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 258B | 97.4M | 264,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.03 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | 12.69 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.15 | 43.28 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.40 | 32.35 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement