Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SBACX
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SBACX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
Touchstone Balanced C
Price$30.45
Change+$0.09 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets998.62M
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SBACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and SBACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. SBACX (999M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than SBACX: RLBAX (1.15) vs SBACX (0.63). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SBACX: RLBAX (23 years) vs SBACX (27 years). SBACX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). SBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBACX: RLBAX (250) vs SBACX (2500). SBACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.23 vs. RLBAX (9.12). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. SBACX (30.82).
| RLBAX | SBACX | RLBAX / SBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.78 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.78 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.805 | 8.929 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 259B | 999M | 25,926% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.63 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | 11.23 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.15 | 42.12 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.40 | 30.82 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.71 | 66.48 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement