Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SBACX
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SBACX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.28
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
Touchstone Balanced C
Price$30.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SBACX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a StrongBuy and SBACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. SBACX (1.01B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than SBACX: RLBAX (1.07) vs SBACX (0.59). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SBACX: RLBAX (24 years) vs SBACX (28 years). SBACX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). SBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBACX: RLBAX (250) vs SBACX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. SBACX (7.90). SBACX return over 5 years is better than : 33.14 vs. RLBAX (30.69).
| RLBAX | SBACX | RLBAX / SBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.76 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.76 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.993 | 9.426 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269B | 1.01B | 26,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.59 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 7.90 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.81 | 42.97 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.69 | 33.14 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.92 | 68.54 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement