Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SBACX
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SBACX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.99
Change-$0.59 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
Touchstone Balanced C
Price$30.30
Change-$0.63 (-2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SBACX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and SBACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. SBACX (1.01B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than SBACX: RLBAX (1.22) vs SBACX (0.60). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SBACX: RLBAX (24 years) vs SBACX (28 years). SBACX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). SBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBACX: RLBAX (250) vs SBACX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.45 vs. SBACX (6.74). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.35 vs. SBACX (28.86).
| RLBAX | SBACX | RLBAX / SBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.76 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.76 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.371 | 0.265 | 896% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270B | 1.01B | 26,706% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.60 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.45 | 6.74 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.63 | 33.77 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.35 | 28.86 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.34 | 76.53 | 104% |