RLAB
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.03 (+16.67%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
17.26M
ZHSHF
Price
$1.35
Change
-$1.21 (-47.27%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RLAB vs ZHSHF

Header iconRLAB vs ZHSHF Comparison
Open Charts RLAB vs ZHSHFBanner chart's image
Real American Capital
Price$0.21
Change+$0.03 (+16.67%)
Volume$3.18K
Capitalization17.26M
Zhongsheng Group Holdings
Price$1.35
Change-$1.21 (-47.27%)
Volume$14.5K
Capitalization4.27B
RLAB vs ZHSHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RLAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZHSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RLAB vs. ZHSHF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLAB is a Buy and ZHSHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RLAB: $0.21 vs. ZHSHF: $1.35)
Brand notoriety: RLAB and ZHSHF are both not notable
RLAB represents the Specialty Stores, while ZHSHF is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RLAB: 46% vs. ZHSHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- RLAB: $17.26M vs. ZHSHF: $4.27B
RLAB [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $17.26M. ZHSHF’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.16B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.17B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RLAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZHSHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RLAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZHSHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZHSHF is a better buy in the long-term than RLAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RLAB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZHSHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RLAB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZHSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZHSHF is a better buy in the short-term than RLAB.

Price Growth

RLAB (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +60.00% price change this week, while ZHSHF (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.73%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.92% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Automotive Aftermarket (-2.64% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZHSHF($4.27B) has a higher market cap than RLAB($17.3M). RLAB YTD gains are higher at: -16.800 vs. ZHSHF (-47.162).
RLABZHSHFRLAB / ZHSHF
Capitalization17.3M4.27B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-16.800-47.16236%
P/E RatioN/A8.62-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RLAB: Fundamental Ratings
RLAB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RLABZHSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RLAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZHSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCEI0.06N/A
+8.65%
Global Clean Energy, Inc.
GARPY22.11N/A
N/A
Golden Agri-Resources
STJO0.01N/A
N/A
St. Joseph, Inc.
CEIEF0.59N/A
N/A
COELACANTH ENERGY INC
BVRDF30.02N/A
N/A
BUREAU VERITAS SA

RLAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RLAB and JBHIF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RLAB and JBHIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLAB
1D Price
Change %
RLAB100%
N/A
JBHIF - RLAB
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZHSHF - RLAB
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NAAS - RLAB
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
ALTB - RLAB
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPCRF - RLAB
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZHSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZHSHF has been loosely correlated with IHCPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZHSHF jumps, then IHCPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZHSHF
1D Price
Change %
ZHSHF100%
N/A
IHCPF - ZHSHF
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JBHIF - ZHSHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RLAB - ZHSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GHST - ZHSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
+5.96%
SSILF - ZHSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More