RKUNY
Price
$7.04
Change
+$0.34 (+5.07%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
14.77B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZLDSF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
7.08B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RKUNY vs ZLDSF

Header iconRKUNY vs ZLDSF Comparison
Open Charts RKUNY vs ZLDSFBanner chart's image
Rakuten Group
Price$7.04
Change+$0.34 (+5.07%)
Volume$5.59K
Capitalization14.77B
ZALANDO SE
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$195
Capitalization7.08B
RKUNY vs ZLDSF Comparison Chart in %
RKUNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZLDSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RKUNY vs. ZLDSF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RKUNY is a Hold and ZLDSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (RKUNY: $7.04 vs. ZLDSF: $31.01)
Brand notoriety: RKUNY and ZLDSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RKUNY: 59% vs. ZLDSF: 99%
Market capitalization -- RKUNY: $14.77B vs. ZLDSF: $7.08B
RKUNY [@Internet Retail] is valued at $14.77B. ZLDSF’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $7.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.54T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $55.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RKUNY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZLDSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RKUNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZLDSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RKUNY is a better buy in the long-term than ZLDSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RKUNY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZLDSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RKUNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZLDSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZLDSF is a better buy in the short-term than RKUNY.

Price Growth

RKUNY (@Internet Retail) experienced а +7.48% price change this week, while ZLDSF (@Internet Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +170.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

RKUNY is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+1.03% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RKUNY($14.8B) has a higher market cap than ZLDSF($7.08B). RKUNY YTD gains are higher at: 24.442 vs. ZLDSF (-5.313). RKUNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 419B vs. ZLDSF (840M). RKUNY has more cash in the bank: 5.38T vs. ZLDSF (2.67B). ZLDSF has less debt than RKUNY: ZLDSF (1.69B) vs RKUNY (5.31T). RKUNY has higher revenues than ZLDSF: RKUNY (2.39T) vs ZLDSF (10.9B).
RKUNYZLDSFRKUNY / ZLDSF
Capitalization14.8B7.08B209%
EBITDA419B840M49,881%
Gain YTD24.442-5.313-460%
P/E RatioN/A29.08-
Revenue2.39T10.9B21,899%
Total Cash5.38T2.67B201,839%
Total Debt5.31T1.69B315,252%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RKUNY vs ZLDSF: Fundamental Ratings
RKUNY
ZLDSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2447
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10068
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
262
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZLDSF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as RKUNY (98). This means that ZLDSF’s stock grew similarly to RKUNY’s over the last 12 months.

ZLDSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RKUNY (100). This means that ZLDSF’s stock grew similarly to RKUNY’s over the last 12 months.

ZLDSF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as RKUNY (100). This means that ZLDSF’s stock grew similarly to RKUNY’s over the last 12 months.

RKUNY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as ZLDSF (49). This means that RKUNY’s stock grew similarly to ZLDSF’s over the last 12 months.

RKUNY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZLDSF (62). This means that RKUNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZLDSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RKUNYZLDSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RKUNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZLDSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLU208.030.48
+0.23%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® 1500 ValTiltETF
NOVZ45.450.03
+0.07%
TrueShares Structured Outcome Nov ETF
PAAA51.340.02
+0.03%
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
LDDR84.73-0.04
-0.05%
Stone Ridge Trust Stone Ridge 2035 Term Income ETF
FYT55.14-0.14
-0.25%
First Trust Small Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF

RKUNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RKUNY has been loosely correlated with RKUNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RKUNY jumps, then RKUNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RKUNY
1D Price
Change %
RKUNY100%
-1.25%
RKUNF - RKUNY
39%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
AMZN - RKUNY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
ASOMY - RKUNY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JTKWY - RKUNY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
W - RKUNY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
More

ZLDSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZLDSF and YUMSF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZLDSF and YUMSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZLDSF
1D Price
Change %
ZLDSF100%
N/A
YUMSF - ZLDSF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKUNF - ZLDSF
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
RKUNY - ZLDSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
TKAYF - ZLDSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YAHOY - ZLDSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
More