RKLIF
Price
$4.67
Change
+$0.41 (+9.62%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
20.57B
SCGPY
Price
$2.78
Change
+$0.10 (+3.73%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RKLIF vs SCGPY

Header iconRKLIF vs SCGPY Comparison
Open Charts RKLIF vs SCGPYBanner chart's image
Rentokil Initial
Price$4.67
Change+$0.41 (+9.62%)
Volume$74.48K
Capitalization20.57B
Serco Group
Price$2.78
Change+$0.10 (+3.73%)
Volume$212
Capitalization2.2B
RKLIF vs SCGPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RKLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RKLIF vs. SCGPY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RKLIF is a Buy and SCGPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (RKLIF: $4.67 vs. SCGPY: $2.78)
Brand notoriety: RKLIF and SCGPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RKLIF: 228% vs. SCGPY: 32%
Market capitalization -- RKLIF: $20.57B vs. SCGPY: $2.2B
RKLIF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $20.57B. SCGPY’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RKLIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGPY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • RKLIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCGPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCGPY is a better buy in the long-term than RKLIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RKLIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGPY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RKLIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCGPY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCGPY is a better buy in the short-term than RKLIF.

Price Growth

RKLIF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCGPY (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.86% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RKLIF($20.6B) has a higher market cap than SCGPY($2.2B). RKLIF has higher P/E ratio than SCGPY: RKLIF (53.48) vs SCGPY (11.74). SCGPY YTD gains are higher at: 61.657 vs. RKLIF (-5.657). RKLIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 993M vs. SCGPY (392M). RKLIF has higher revenues than SCGPY: RKLIF (4.81B) vs SCGPY (4.53B).
RKLIFSCGPYRKLIF / SCGPY
Capitalization20.6B2.2B935%
EBITDA993M392M253%
Gain YTD-5.65761.657-9%
P/E Ratio53.4811.74456%
Revenue4.81B4.53B106%
Total Cash1.42BN/A-
Total Debt4.67BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RKLIF vs SCGPY: Fundamental Ratings
RKLIF
SCGPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9719
SMR RATING
1..100
9390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
612
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RKLIF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGPY (33). This means that RKLIF’s stock grew similarly to SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RKLIF (97). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew significantly faster than RKLIF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as RKLIF (93). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to RKLIF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as RKLIF (57). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to RKLIF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RKLIF (61). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RKLIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RKLIFSCGPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RKLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INCR1.560.08
+5.41%
Intercure Ltd
CLS159.264.36
+2.81%
Celestica
CMP22.250.23
+1.04%
Compass Minerals International
EGO20.770.06
+0.29%
Eldorado Gold Corp
OLB1.66-0.14
-7.78%
OLB Group Inc. (The)

RKLIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RKLIF and SCTBF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RKLIF and SCTBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RKLIF
1D Price
Change %
RKLIF100%
N/A
SCTBF - RKLIF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDXAY - RKLIF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.57%
SDXOF - RKLIF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGSOF - RKLIF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCGPY - RKLIF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGPY has been loosely correlated with SECUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGPY jumps, then SECUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGPY
1D Price
Change %
SCGPY100%
N/A
SECUF - SCGPY
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
CASS - SCGPY
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
BMBLF - SCGPY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GHC - SCGPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
BRC - SCGPY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More