It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RKAGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMSYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RKAGY’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMSYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
RKAGY (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while RMSYF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -0.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.99%.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
RKAGY | RMSYF | RKAGY / RMSYF | |
Capitalization | 871M | 9.06B | 10% |
EBITDA | 111M | 1.71B | 6% |
Gain YTD | 25.730 | 19.506 | 132% |
P/E Ratio | 26.60 | 43.48 | 61% |
Revenue | 1.46B | 13.7B | 11% |
Total Cash | N/A | 1.5B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 9.52B | - |
RKAGY | RMSYF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RKAGY's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMSYF (79). This means that RKAGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMSYF’s over the last 12 months.
RKAGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMSYF (100). This means that RKAGY’s stock grew similarly to RMSYF’s over the last 12 months.
RKAGY's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as RMSYF (98). This means that RKAGY’s stock grew similarly to RMSYF’s over the last 12 months.
RKAGY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as RMSYF (47). This means that RKAGY’s stock grew similarly to RMSYF’s over the last 12 months.
RMSYF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RKAGY (60). This means that RMSYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RKAGY’s over the last 12 months.
RKAGY | RMSYF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago25% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago7% | 5 days ago19% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago25% | 5 days ago22% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago12% | 5 days ago27% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago7% | 5 days ago23% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago50% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago8% | 5 days ago14% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RKAGY and NWKHY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RKAGY and NWKHY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RKAGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RKAGY | 100% | -0.57% | ||
NWKHY - RKAGY | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
JYNT - RKAGY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
VLXC - RKAGY | 15% Poorly correlated | -3.38% | ||
RMYHY - RKAGY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RHCGF - RKAGY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RMSYF and DVA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMSYF and DVA's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMSYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RMSYF | 100% | N/A | ||
DVA - RMSYF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CMPS - RMSYF | 15% Poorly correlated | -3.55% | ||
VLXC - RMSYF | 0% Poorly correlated | -3.38% | ||
RYHTY - RMSYF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RKAGY - RMSYF | -1% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
More |