RJF
Price
$165.80
Change
+$0.03 (+0.02%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
32.61B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WT
Price
$12.55
Change
-$0.07 (-0.55%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.77B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RJF vs WT

Header iconRJF vs WT Comparison
Open Charts RJF vs WTBanner chart's image
Raymond James Financial
Price$165.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.02%)
Volume$411.1K
Capitalization32.61B
WisdomTree
Price$12.55
Change-$0.07 (-0.55%)
Volume$1.05M
Capitalization1.77B
RJF vs WT Comparison Chart in %
RJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RJF vs. WT commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RJF is a Buy and WT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (RJF: $165.80 vs. WT: $12.55)
Brand notoriety: RJF: Not notable vs. WT: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RJF: 31% vs. WT: 35%
Market capitalization -- RJF: $32.61B vs. WT: $1.77B
RJF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $32.61B. WT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the long-term than WT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the short-term than RJF.

Price Growth

RJF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.97% price change this week, while WT (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

RJF is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

WT is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RJF($32.6B) has a higher market cap than WT($1.77B). WT has higher P/E ratio than RJF: WT (19.61) vs RJF (16.10). WT YTD gains are higher at: 20.537 vs. RJF (8.137). RJF has more cash in the bank: 2.61B vs. WT (660M). WT has less debt than RJF: WT (956M) vs RJF (4.22B). RJF has higher revenues than WT: RJF (13.8B) vs WT (457M).
RJFWTRJF / WT
Capitalization32.6B1.77B1,846%
EBITDAN/A155M-
Gain YTD8.13720.53740%
P/E Ratio16.1019.6182%
Revenue13.8B457M3,020%
Total Cash2.61B660M396%
Total Debt4.22B956M441%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RJF vs WT: Fundamental Ratings
RJF
WT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7715
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1924
SMR RATING
1..100
1037
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WT's Valuation (74) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as RJF (78) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that WT’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as WT (24) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to WT’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's SMR Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as WT (37) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to WT’s over the last 12 months.

WT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as RJF (51) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that WT’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WT (92) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RJFWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DESGX26.020.10
+0.39%
DWS Enhanced Core Equity Institutional
CLGRX75.990.20
+0.26%
Calvert US Large Cap Growth Rspnb Idx R6
PABAX17.030.03
+0.18%
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
JMGZX43.710.08
+0.18%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R2
LPFAX5.69N/A
N/A
ALPS Global Opportunity A

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
+0.02%
SF - RJF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
MS - RJF
82%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
EVR - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
AMP - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
GS - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
More

WT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WT has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WT jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WT
1D Price
Change %
WT100%
-0.55%
JHG - WT
66%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
AMG - WT
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
KKR - WT
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
RJF - WT
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
BN - WT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
More