RJF
Price
$151.54
Change
-$3.53 (-2.28%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
26.84B
60 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$103.91
Change
-$3.29 (-3.07%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.95B
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

RJF vs SF

Header iconRJF vs SF Comparison
Open Charts RJF vs SFBanner chart's image
Raymond James Financial
Price$151.54
Change-$3.53 (-2.28%)
Volume$1.67M
Capitalization26.84B
Stifel Financial
Price$103.91
Change-$3.29 (-3.07%)
Volume$822.37K
Capitalization7.95B
RJF vs SF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RJF vs. SF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RJF is a Hold and SF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (RJF: $160.92 vs. SF: $111.36)
Brand notoriety: RJF and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RJF: 123% vs. SF: 80%
Market capitalization -- RJF: $26.84B vs. SF: $7.95B
RJF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $26.84B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the long-term than SF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RJF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than RJF.

Price Growth

RJF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

RJF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.21% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RJF($26.8B) has a higher market cap than SF($7.95B). SF has higher P/E ratio than RJF: SF (18.06) vs RJF (16.09). SF YTD gains are higher at: 4.977 vs. RJF (3.933). SF has less debt than RJF: SF (1.18B) vs RJF (3.14B). RJF has higher revenues than SF: RJF (11.7B) vs SF (4.29B).
RJFSFRJF / SF
Capitalization26.8B7.95B337%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.9334.97779%
P/E Ratio16.0918.0689%
Revenue11.7B4.29B273%
Total Cash2.61BN/A-
Total Debt3.14B1.18B267%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RJF vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
RJF
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6974
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
911
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4655
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SF's Valuation (81) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (89). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (9). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's SMR Rating (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (11). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (45). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (55). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RJFSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
+0.68%
SF - RJF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
MS - RJF
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
SCHW - RJF
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
PIPR - RJF
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
GS - RJF
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
+0.90%
PIPR - SF
79%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
GS - SF
78%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
RJF - SF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
EVR - SF
76%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
MS - SF
73%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
More