RHCO
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SLFPF
Price
$2.55
Change
-$0.06 (-2.30%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.79B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RHCO vs SLFPF

Header iconRHCO vs SLFPF Comparison
Open Charts RHCO vs SLFPFBanner chart's image
Readen Holding
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.2K
CapitalizationN/A
ABRDN
Price$2.55
Change-$0.06 (-2.30%)
Volume$3.4K
Capitalization5.79B
RHCO vs SLFPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RHCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RHCO vs. SLFPF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RHCO is a Hold and SLFPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (RHCO: $0.05 vs. SLFPF: $2.55)
Brand notoriety: RHCO and SLFPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RHCO: 4% vs. SLFPF: 269%
Market capitalization -- RHCO: $0 vs. SLFPF: $5.79B
RHCO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. SLFPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RHCO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLFPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RHCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLFPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPF is a better buy in the long-term than RHCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RHCO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLFPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RHCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLFPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RHCO is a better buy in the short-term than SLFPF.

Price Growth

RHCO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +60.77% price change this week, while SLFPF (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHCO YTD gains are higher at: 212.500 vs. SLFPF (44.068).
RHCOSLFPFRHCO / SLFPF
CapitalizationN/A5.79B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD212.50044.068482%
P/E RatioN/A7.54-
RevenueN/A2.31B-
Total CashN/A1.34B-
Total DebtN/A707M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RHCO vs SLFPF: Fundamental Ratings
RHCO
SLFPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92100
SMR RATING
1..100
10052
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RHCO (83). This means that SLFPF’s stock grew significantly faster than RHCO’s over the last 12 months.

RHCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (100). This means that RHCO’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RHCO (100). This means that SLFPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RHCO’s over the last 12 months.

RHCO's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (42). This means that RHCO’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

RHCO's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPF (100). This means that RHCO’s stock grew similarly to SLFPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RHCOSLFPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RHCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTA9.260.11
+1.20%
Blackrock Long-Term Municipal Advantage Trust
PSFJ31.140.13
+0.43%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF
JIVE69.810.25
+0.37%
JPMorgan International Value ETF
SIXZ28.480.07
+0.23%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 May/Nov ETF
NEA11.010.01
+0.09%
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund

RHCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RHCO and AJMPF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RHCO and AJMPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RHCO
1D Price
Change %
RHCO100%
+1.63%
AJMPF - RHCO
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHF - RHCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
SLFPY - RHCO
15%
Poorly correlated
+7.36%
SLFPF - RHCO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFI - RHCO
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More

SLFPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPF and SLFPY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPF and SLFPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPF
1D Price
Change %
SLFPF100%
N/A
SLFPY - SLFPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.36%
HALFF - SLFPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
BENF - SLFPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.05%
STJPF - SLFPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUILF - SLFPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More