RH
Price
$158.32
Change
-$2.70 (-1.68%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.97B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TBHC
Price
$1.31
Change
-$0.07 (-5.07%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
29.65M
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RH vs TBHC

Header iconRH vs TBHC Comparison
Open Charts RH vs TBHCBanner chart's image
RH
Price$158.32
Change-$2.70 (-1.68%)
Volume$714.5K
Capitalization2.97B
THE BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE
Price$1.31
Change-$0.07 (-5.07%)
Volume$88.09K
Capitalization29.65M
RH vs TBHC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RH vs. TBHC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RH is a Hold and TBHC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (RH: $161.02 vs. TBHC: $1.38)
Brand notoriety: RH: Notable vs. TBHC: Not notable
RH represents the Specialty Stores, while TBHC is part of the Home Improvement Chains industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RH: 50% vs. TBHC: 24%
Market capitalization -- RH: $2.97B vs. TBHC: $29.65M
RH [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $2.97B. TBHC’s [@Home Improvement Chains] market capitalization is $29.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $47.13B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry ranges from $366.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry is $40.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RH is a better buy in the long-term than TBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBHC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TBHC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RH is a better buy in the short-term than TBHC.

Price Growth

RH (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -3.11% price change this week, while TBHC (@Home Improvement Chains) price change was -9.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.75%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

RH is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

TBHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.74% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Home Improvement Chains (-2.28% weekly)

The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RH($2.97B) has a higher market cap than TBHC($29.6M). TBHC YTD gains are higher at: -14.815 vs. RH (-59.089). RH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 499M vs. TBHC (-16.65M). RH has more cash in the bank: 34.6M vs. TBHC (3.64M). TBHC has less debt than RH: TBHC (162M) vs RH (3.91B). RH has higher revenues than TBHC: RH (3.34B) vs TBHC (421M).
RHTBHCRH / TBHC
Capitalization2.97B29.6M10,027%
EBITDA499M-16.65M-2,997%
Gain YTD-59.089-14.815399%
P/E Ratio29.54N/A-
Revenue3.34B421M793%
Total Cash34.6M3.64M950%
Total Debt3.91B162M2,415%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RH vs TBHC: Fundamental Ratings
RH
TBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7970
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
32100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9996
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TBHC's Valuation (51) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (63). This means that TBHC’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

TBHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (100). This means that TBHC’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

RH's SMR Rating (32) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for TBHC (100). This means that RH’s stock grew significantly faster than TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TBHC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (86). This means that TBHC’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

TBHC's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (99). This means that TBHC’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RHTBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TBHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DELL140.711.95
+1.41%
Dell Technologies
DAR34.540.23
+0.67%
Darling Ingredients
DFDV8.360.03
+0.36%
DeFi Development Corp
PC9.40N/A
N/A
Premium Catering Holdings Limited
NVAX7.20-0.24
-3.23%
Novavax

RH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RH has been closely correlated with WSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RH jumps, then WSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RH
1D Price
Change %
RH100%
-0.72%
WSM - RH
68%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
FIVE - RH
67%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
FND - RH
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.88%
BBY - RH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
ASO - RH
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
More

TBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBHC has been loosely correlated with FLWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBHC jumps, then FLWS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBHC
1D Price
Change %
TBHC100%
-3.50%
FLWS - TBHC
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
HZO - TBHC
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
HNST - TBHC
35%
Loosely correlated
+8.73%
RH - TBHC
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
LE - TBHC
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
More