Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGWFX vs TSALX
RGWFX vs TSALX Comparison
Open Charts RGWFX vs TSALX
American Funds Growth Portfolio R5
Price$29.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.6B
Nuveen Lifestyle Aggressive Gr A
Price$22.17
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.91M
RGWFX vs TSALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGWFX vs. TSALX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGWFX is a Hold and TSALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWFX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. TSALX (261M). TSALX pays higher dividends than RGWFX: TSALX (1.28) vs RGWFX (0.64). RGWFX was incepted earlier than TSALX: RGWFX (13 years) vs TSALX (14 years). TSALX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RGWFX (0.43). RGWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSALX: RGWFX (250) vs TSALX (2500). RGWFX (13.86) and TSALX (13.20) have marching annual gain over last year. RGWFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.62 vs. TSALX (39.88).
| RGWFX | TSALX | RGWFX / TSALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.94 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.05 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.652 | 12.367 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.6B | 261M | 9,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.28 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | 13.20 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.31 | 34.10 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.62 | 39.88 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.81 | 67.81 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement