Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGWBX vs TSALX
RGWBX vs TSALX Comparison
Open Charts RGWBX vs TSALX
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.48
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.6B
Nuveen Lifestyle Aggressive Gr A
Price$22.17
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.91M
RGWBX vs TSALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGWBX vs. TSALX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGWBX is a Hold and TSALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. TSALX (261M). TSALX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: TSALX (1.28) vs RGWBX (0.00). RGWBX was incepted earlier than TSALX: RGWBX (13 years) vs TSALX (14 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than TSALX (1.05). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSALX: RGWBX (250) vs TSALX (2500). TSALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.20 vs. RGWBX (12.39). TSALX return over 5 years is better than : 39.88 vs. RGWBX (36.90).
| RGWBX | TSALX | RGWBX / TSALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.94 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.05 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.901 | 12.367 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.6B | 261M | 9,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.28 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.39 | 13.20 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.03 | 34.10 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.90 | 39.88 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.99 | 67.81 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement